And this is not altogether fanciful.
For example, toe the line is sometimes written as tow the line. Examples that Orwell gave included "ring the changes", "Achilles' heel", "swan song", and "hotbed".
When you are composing in a hurry — when you are dictating to a stenographer, for instance, or making a public speech — it is natural to fall into a pretentious, Latinized style. They are a little below the average, but are fairly representative samples.
Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive.
Orwell noted the deliberate use of misleading language to hide unpleasant political and military facts and also identified a laxity of language among those he identified as pro-Soviet. In this way, he showed how sentences had lost their concreteness in modern English prose and despite its plentiful use of words that are rooted in Latin and Greek, the translation does not deliver half the meaning as the original.
Silly words and expressions have often disappeared, not through any evolutionary process but owing to the conscious action of a minority. Here it is in modern English: Davies in Mission to Moscow. It will be seen that I have not made a full translation. The will construct your sentences for you — even think your thoughts for you, to a certain extent — and at need they will perform the important service of partially concealing your meaning even from yourself.
Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
It is neither concerned with fake simplicity or with making English colloquial. It is rather the same thing that is happening to the English language.
The keynote is the elimination of simple verbs.
But all these are minor points. Silly words and expressions have often disappeared, not through any evolutionary process but owing to the conscious action of a minority.
Some of the key phrases include render inoperative, militate against, prove unacceptable etc. Furthermore, he said that using metaphors of this kind made the original meaning of the phrases meaningless, because those who used them did not know their original meaning.
I open it at random, and here is almost the first sentence that I see: Things like the continuance of British rule in India, the Russian purges and deportations, the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan, can indeed be defended, but only by arguments which are too brutal for most people to face, and which do not square with the professed aims of the political parties.
George Orwell goes on to cite passages from several prominent essays and articles, concluding on the similarities in their staleness of imagery and lack of precision.
But if thought corrupts language, language can also corrupt thought. Probably it is better to put off using words as long as possible and get one's meaning as clear as one can through pictures or sensations. George Orwell’s essay “Politics and the English Language”is one of the most famous of all works urging that writing should be clear, direct, and vivid.
In the course of analyzing and mocking. The Intro of the essay asserts the notion that the English language has been disfigured by the human race and is on the residual decline as a resultant.
Mr. Orwell attributes this downfall to politics and economic causes but goes on to outline his remedy to correct what he refers to as a “reversible” process. George Orwell Politics and the English Language Most people who bother with the matter at all would admit that the English language is in a bad way, but it is generally assumed that we cannot by conscious action do anything about it.
George Orwell’s Politics and the English Language raises somewhat similar concerns as his ‘’. It is one of his most famous essays written regarding the decay of language and use of political language to conceal political sins. Politics and the English Language - University of Washington.
"Politics and the English Language" () is an essay by George Orwell that criticises the "ugly and inaccurate" written English of his time and examines the connection between political orthodoxies and the debasement of language/5.George orwell politics and the english language essay